Soft Living as a Paradigm Shift in Modern Work Culture: A Qualitative Literature Review of Generation Z and Millennials
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59890/ijatss.v4i9.274Keywords:
Soft Living, Work Culture, Generation Z, Millenial, Employee well-beingAbstract
This study aims to examine “soft living” as a new paradigm in the transformation of modern work culture among Generation Z and millennials. The increasingly dynamic nature of the workplace is driving a shift from a productivity-oriented approach toward a more flexible one that prioritizes employee well-being. As the dominant groups in the workforce, Generation Z and millennials possess characteristics that emphasize work-life balance, the meaning of work, and attention to mental health, thereby influencing changes in workplace culture within organizations. This study employs a qualitative approach using a literature review method, drawing from various scientific journals, books, and relevant publications. The findings indicate that soft living serves as a response to the pressures of modern work culture by emphasizing balance, self-awareness, and healthy stress management. The implementation of this concept within organizations is reflected through work flexibility and increased attention to employee well-being. Thus, soft living can be viewed as a relevant paradigm in fostering a more humane, adaptive, and sustainable work culture
References
Allen, T. D., Johnson, R. C., Kiburz, K. M., & Shockley, K. M. (2013). WORK – FAMILY CONFLICT AND FLEXIBLE WORK ARRANGEMENTS : DECONSTRUCTING FLEXIBILITY. Personnel Psychology, 66(2), 345–376. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12012
Brough, P., Timms, C., Driscoll, M. P. O., Siu, O., Sit, C., & Lo, D. (2014). Work–life balance: a longitudinal evaluation of a new measure across Australia and New Zealand workers. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(19), 2724-2744,. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2014.899262
Brown, B. (2018). Dare to Lead: Brave Work. Tough Conversations. Whole Hearts. Random House.
Cieri, H. De, Holmes, B., Abbott, J., & Pettit, T. (2005). Achievements and challenges for work / life balance strategies in Australian organizations Achievements and challenges for work / life balance strategies in Australian organizations. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(1), 90–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/0958519042000295966
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (Ed.3). Sage.
Dalton, T. (2019). The Joy of Missing Out: Live More by Doing Less. Thomas Nelson Incorporated.
Dimock, M. (2019). Defining generations: Where Millennials end and Generation Z begins. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2019/01/17/where-millennials-end-and-generation-z-begins/
Francis, T., & Hoefel, F. (2018). True Gen’: Generation Z and its implications for companies. McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/consumer-packaged-goods/our-insights/true-gen-generation-z-and-its-implications-for-companies#/
Good, D. J., Lyddy, C. J., Glomb, T. M., Bono, J. E., Brown, K. W., Duffy, M. K., Baer, R. A., Brewer, J. A., & Lazar, S. W. (2015). Contemplating Mindfulness at Work : An Integrative Review. Journal of Management, XX(X), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315617003
Guest, D. E. (2017). Human resource management and employee well-being: towards a new analytic framework. Human Resource Management Journal, 27(1), 22–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12139
Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Keyes, C. L. M. (2003). WELL-BEING IN THE WORKPLACE AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO BUSINESS OUTCOMES A REVIEW OF THE GALLUP STUDIES. In Flourishing: The Positive Person and the Good Life (pp. 205–224). American Psychological Association.
Kasser, T. (2016). Materialistic Values and Goals. The Annual Review OfPsychology, 67, 489–514. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033344
Kniffin, K. ., Narayanan, J., Anseel, F., Antonakis, J., Ashford, S. P., Bakker, A. B., Bamberger, P., Bapuji, H., Bhave, D. P., Choi, V. K., Creary, S. J., Demerouti, E., Flynn, F. J., Gelfand, M. J., Greer, L. L., Johns, G., Kesebir, S., Klein, P. G., Lee, S. Y., & Ozcelik, H. (2026). COVID-19 and the workplace: Implications, issues, and insights for future research and action. American Psychologist, 76(1), 63–77.
Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. P. (2016). Understanding the burnout experience : recent research and its implications for psychiatry. World Psychiatry, 15(2), 103–111.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2013). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (Ed.3). SAGE Publications,.
Pfeffer, J. (2018). Dying for a Paycheck: How Modern Management Harms Employee Health and Company Performance--and what We Can Do about it (Ed.Rev). HarperCollins.
Richardson, K. M., & Rothstein, H. R. (2008). Effects of Occupational Stress Management Intervention Programs : A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 13(1), 69–93. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.13.1.69
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2017). Organizational Behavior (Ed.17). Pearson Education.
Schein, E. H. (2012). Organizational Culture and Leadership,. In Leadership & Organization Development Journal (ED.4, Vol. 33, Issue 4). Jossey-Bass Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437731211229331
Schroth, H. (2019). Are You Ready for Gen Z in the Workplace? California Management Review, 61(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619841006
Seemiller, C., & Grace, M. (2016). Generation Z Goes to College. Jhon willey and Sons Inc.
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology : An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104(March), 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Sonnentag, S. (2018). Research in Organizational Behavior The recovery paradox : Portraying the complex interplay between job stressors , lack of recovery , and poor well-being. Research in Organizational Behavior, 38, 169–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2018.11.002
Stillman, D., & Stillman, J. (2017). Gen Z @ Work: How the Next Generation Is Transforming the Workplace. HarperCollins.
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review *. British Journal of Management, 14, 207–222.
Twenge, J. M. (2017). iGen: Why Today’s Super-Connected Kids Are Growing Up Less Rebellious, More Tolerant, Less Happy--and Completely Unprepared for Adulthood--and What That Means for the Rest of Us. Simon and Schuster.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sudung Simatupang, Marto Silalahi, Debi Eka Putri, Hendrick Sasimtam Putra, Vivi Candra

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.





