Analysis of the Indonesian Presidential Regulation on the Revitalization of Vocational Education and Training: Policy Implications for Strategic Decision Making in Vocational Education Institutions

Authors

  • Muhammad Andriana Gaffar Universitasi Islam Nusantara
  • Ilfi Johar Nafisah STAI Asshiddiqiyah
  • Cep Agung Muharam STAI Baitul Arqom Al Islami Ciparay
  • Narkum STAI DR. KH. EZ. Muttaqien
  • Sifa Malihatul Husna Praktisi Pendidikan, Purwakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59890/ijatss.v3i6.35

Keywords:

Vocational Education Revitalization Policy, Strategic Decision Making

Abstract

Vocational education is one of the important pillars in preparing competent and work-ready human resources, especially in facing the challenges of the industrial revolution 4.0 and society 5.0. This policy not only emphasizes strengthening learning infrastructure, but also on synergy between vocational education institutions and the business world/industrial world (DUDI). This study aims to analyze the implementation of the vocational education revitalization policy at BLK SMK Negeri 1 Purwakarta and assess its implications for the strategic decision-making process at the institutional level. Using a descriptive qualitative approach, data were obtained through direct observation, interviews with schools and industry partners, and documentation studies of formal institutional documents. The results of the study show that BLK SMK Negeri 1 Purwakarta has implemented most of the elements of the revitalization policy consistently. The availability of SWOT analysis documents, RKAT, and the active involvement of industry partners are the main strengths in implementing the program. However, several challenges such as the limited availability of the latest practical tools and the need for continuous HR training are still important notes in efforts to improve the program in the future. This finding underlines the importance of continuous monitoring and evaluation in overseeing the implementation of vocational policies at the education unit level. A strong commitment from school leaders, support from regional policies, and broader DUDI involvement are needed so that the revitalization of vocational education does not stop at the administrative level, but truly contributes to improving the quality of graduates who are adaptive, productive, and highly competitive

References

Biesta, G. (2010). Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, politics, democracy. Routledge.

Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2006). The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: Propositions from the literature. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 44–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00665.x

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Djojonegoro, W. (1998). Pengembangan sumber daya manusia melalui SMK. Jakarta: Depdikbud.

Edward III, G. C. (1980). Implementing public policy. Congressional Quarterly Press.

Fullan, M. (2001). Leading in a culture of change. Jossey-Bass.

Grollmann, P., & Rauner, F. (Eds.). (2007). International perspectives on teachers and lecturers in technical and vocational education. Springer.

Herlina, E., & Widodo, T. (2022). Strategi manajemen SMK dalam menyelaraskan pendidikan dengan kebutuhan industri. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 12(1), 15–27.

Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Kemko Perekonomian. (2022). Revitalisasi pendidikan vokasi dorong pembangunan SDM unggul. Diakses dari https://ekon.go.id/

Lestari, D., & Mulyana, D. (2022). Evaluasi implementasi teaching factory pada SMK negeri di Jawa Barat. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 8(2), 87–98.

Marzano, R. J., & Waters, T. (2009). District leadership that works: Striking the right balance. Solution Tree Press.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Mulyasa, E. (2019). Manajemen pendidikan kejuruan. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Naim, M. (2018). Reformasi pendidikan vokasi dalam era revolusi industri. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan, 21(2), 105–112.

Nurfadhilah, I., & Saputra, A. (2020). Hambatan implementasi revitalisasi SMK di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 25(3), 223–234.

Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 68 Tahun 2022 tentang Revitalisasi Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Vokasi.

Robbins, S. P., & Coulter, M. (2016). Management (13th ed.). Pearson Education.

Setyosari, P., & Suryani, D. (2021). Ketimpangan implementasi pendidikan vokasi dan tantangannya. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 27(1), 45–60.

Siregar, R., & Sutarno, H. (2021). Kolaborasi SMK dan industri dalam program revitalisasi pendidikan vokasi. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi Indonesia, 2(2), 90–101.

Sutrisno, E. (2019). Evaluasi program revitalisasi SMK berbasis model CIPP. Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan, 10(2), 112–124.

Suryadi, D., & Sudira, P. (2021). Tracer study lulusan SMK dan relevansinya terhadap kebijakan pendidikan vokasi. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 22(1), 77–88.

UNESCO. (2015). Unleashing the potential: Transforming technical and vocational education and training. UNESCO Publishing.

Wheelen, T. L., & Hunger, J. D. (2012). Strategic management and business policy (13th ed.). Pearson Education.

Wibowo, A. (2020). Kepemimpinan transformasional kepala SMK dalam revitalisasi pendidikan vokasi. Jurnal Kepemimpinan Pendidikan, 8(1), 33–44.

Wibowo, A. (2021). Visi kepemimpinan pendidikan vokasi dalam era industri 4.0. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Vokasi, 3(1), 15–24.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-12

Issue

Section

Articles