Artificial Intelligence as a Symbolic Colonizer: A Posthuman Reading of H. G. Wells’s the War of the Worlds
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59890/ijsss.v3i6.165Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Symbolic Colonization, Technological Superiority, Colonial Reversal, Epistemic ViolenceAbstract
This paper offers a posthumanist reading of H.G. Wells’ The War of the Worlds wherein it will discuss how the extraterrestrial invaders can be symbolic representatives for the artificial intelligence (AI) component in an exercising colonial invasion. Applying posthuman and decolonial theoretical perspectives, this article endeavors to explore how fears regarding technological domination, cultural extinction, and human agency disempowerment could be foregrounded through the literary representation of nonhuman intelligences. Mechanized highly intelligent beings, the Martians simultaneously symbolize imperial invaders and future-oriented anxiety whereby artificial intelligence emerges as a new colonizer—over identity, labor, and information. This paper applies the writings of decolonial AI scholars N. Katherine Hayles, Francesca Ferrando, and Homi Bhabha for an account of how Wells anticipates the problematic of technological imperialism and human-machine hybridity that comes quite vividly into prominence in the twenty-first century. Thus, science fiction has become the ground on which to do battle philosophically and prophetically over negotiating posthuman identity as an act of resistance against technological colonization. The book shall be framed as a prescient critique of technological imperialism so people can meditate on how algorithmized the world has to become before humans finally exercise their full potential
References
Al-Buqai, A. (2016). Identity and Displacement in Arab-American Theatre. Journal of Cultural Studies, 22(2), 105–120.
Barthes, R. (1977). Image, Music, Text. Fontana Press.
Birhane, A. (2020). Algorithmic colonization of Africa. SCRIPTed, 17(2), 389–409. https://doi.org/10.2966/scrip.170220.389
Bostrom, N. (2014). Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies. Oxford University Press.
Braidotti, R. (2013). The Posthuman. Polity Press.
Braidotti, R., & Hlavajova, M. (Eds.). (2018). Posthuman Glossary. Bloomsbury Academic.
Braidotti, R., & Hlavajova, M. (Eds.). The Posthuman Glossary. Bloomsbury Academic, 2018.
Bratton, B. (2016). The Stack: On Software and Sovereignty. MIT Press.
Chakrabarty, Dipesh. (2009). The Climate of History in a Planetary Age. University of Chicago Press.
Crawford, K. “The Colonial Supply Chain of AI.” Philosophy & Technology, 2023.
Cudworth, E., & Hobden, S. "The Posthuman Way of War." Security Dialogue, 2015.
Danaher, J. (2019). Automation and Utopia: Human Flourishing in a World Without Work. Harvard University Press.
European Business Review. “The Silent Colonization of Consciousness: AI as the New Other.” 2024.
Fish, S. (1980). Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities. Harvard University Press.
Freedman, C. (2000). Critical Theory and Science Fiction. Wesleyan University Press.
Haraway, D. J. (1985). A cyborg manifesto: Science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century. In Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature (pp. 149–181). Routledge.
Hayles, N. K. (1999). How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. University of Chicago Press.
Iser, W. (1978). The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford University Press.
Mohamed, S., Png, M. T., & Isaac, W. (2020). Decolonial AI: Decolonial theory as sociotechnical foresight in artificial intelligence. Philosophy & Technology, 33, 659–684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-020-00405-8
Mollema, L. (2024). AI colonialism as epistemic, ecological, and political disenclosure. (Publication forthcoming or preprint – check availability.)
Prabhakaran, V., Qadri, R., & Hutchinson, B. “Cultural Incongruencies in Artificial Intelligence.” arXiv, 2022.
Ricoeur, P. (1976). Interpretation Theory: Discourse and the Surplus of Meaning. TCU Press.
Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2020). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (4th ed.). Pearson.
Safaa, H. I. (2024). Human reaction due to the influence of political and social circumstances in Harold Pinter's Birthday Party And WB Yeats and Lady Gregory's Cathleen Ni Houlihan. Wisdom Journal For Studies & Research, 4(06), 1238-1260.
Seed, D. (1995). Anticipations: Essays on Early Science Fiction and Its Precursors. Syracuse University Press.
Suvin, D. (1979). Metamorphoses of Science Fiction: On the Poetics and History of a Literary Genre. Yale University Press.
Tegmark, M. (2017). Life 3.0: Being Human in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. Knopf.
Thomsen, M. R., & Wamberg, J. (Eds.). (2020). The Bloomsbury Handbook of Posthumanism. Bloomsbury Academic.
Varshney, K. R. “Decolonial AI Alignment.” arXiv, 2023.
Wells, H. G. (1898). The War of the Worlds. William Heinemann.
Wolfe, C. (2010). What Is Posthumanism? University of Minnesota Press.
Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. PublicAffairs.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Safaa Haqi Ismaiel
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
